Test summary outcome
	Automatic	Human review
Priority 1	0	161
Priority 2	34	103
Priority 3	29	71

» LA CERAMICA BIONICTILE by CERACASA PREMIADA COMO UNA DE LAS 100 MEJORES INNOVACIONES EN 2009

EXAMEN A LA INNOVACIÓN. BIONICTILE SELECCIONADA COMO UNA
DE LAS 100 MEJORES IDEAS.

La revista ACTUALIDAD ECONOMICA ha concedido a CERACASA este pasado lunes el premio a “las 100 mejores ideas”, por la cerámica descontaminante BIONICTILE.

La empresa de Castellón ha sido la única empresa del sector cerámico que ha recibido dicho galardón con el que también fueron premiadas otras empresas como: Acciona, Endesa, Gamesa, Indra, Gas Natural Fenosa, Grupo Leche Pascual, Banco Popular, la Universidad de Alcalá¡, American Express, Sigre, Peugeot, Linea Directa, Kenzo, UPS Hospitales, Nokia, Mutua Madrileña, Canon, Kodak, Bosch o Adecco.

Esta cerámica desarrollada, por CERACASA y FMC-Foret, está siendo toda una revolución en la arquitectura sostenible por su actividad positiva con el entorno donde se ubica. Como así lo confirman distintos estudios realizados por la Fundación CEAM y la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Un metro cuadrado de BIONICTILE puede llegar a descontaminar hasta 250 microgramos/hora de los perjudiciales óxidos de nitrógeno (NOx) y retirar hasta el 74 % de ácido nítrico (responsable de la lluvia ácida) del aire de nuestras ciudades.

El Director General de Ceracasa, D. Carlos Cabrera y el Director de Negocio de FMC-Foret D. Pedro Ribosa, recogieron el galardón en Madrid en un acto al que acudieron numerosas personalidades e instituciones.

La necesidad de invertir en I+D se ha convertido en un recurso común en cualquier empresa. Pero más allá de los discursos, es cierto que la economía española necesita ser más innovadora. Algunas empresas y productos marcan el camino. Es por ello que ACTUALIDAD ECONOMICA reconoce con estos tradicionales premios la creatividad y el ingenio empresarial que como el de CERACASA, innovan, descubriéndonos la cerámica del futuro.

» LA CERAMICA BIONICTILE by CERACASA PREMIADA COMO UNA DE LAS 100 MEJORES INNOVACIONES EN 2009

Found issues:

Problemas de accesibilidad de Prioridad 1

2.1 Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup.

4.1 Clearly identify changes in the natural language of a document's text and any text equivalents (e.g., captions).

5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers.

5.2 For data tables that have two or more logical levels of row or column headers, use markup to associate data cells and header cells.

6.1 Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets. For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document.

6.2 Ensure that equivalents for dynamic content are updated when the dynamic content changes.

6.3 Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported. If this is not possible, provide equivalent information on an alternative accessible page.

7.1 Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker.

8.1a Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly accessible or compatible with assistive technologies, if functionality is important and not presented elsewhere.

11.4 If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page.

14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content.

Problemas de accesibilidad de Prioridad 2

3.4 Use relative rather than absolute units in markup language attribute values and style sheet property values.

3.6 Mark up lists and list items properly.

11.2 Avoid deprecated features of W3C technologies.

12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls.

2.2a Ensure that foreground and background color combinations for images provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen.

3.1 When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather than images to convey information.

3.2 Create documents that validate to published formal grammars.

3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.

3.5 Use header elements to convey document structure and use them according to specification.

3.7 Mark up quotations. Do not use quotation markup for formatting effects such as indentation.

5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version).

6.4 For scripts and applets, ensure that event handlers are input device-independent.

7.2 Until user agents allow users to control blinking, avoid causing content to blink (i.e., change presentation at a regular rate, such as turning on and off).

7.3 Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid movement in pages.

8.1b Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly accessible or compatible with assistive technologies.

10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned.

11.1 Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when supported.

13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link.

13.2 Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages and sites.

13.3 Provide information about the general layout of a site (e.g., a site map or table of contents).

13.4 Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner.

Problemas de accesibilidad de Prioridad 3

5.5 Provide summaries for tables.

10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas.

2.2b Ensure that foreground and background color combinations for text provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen.

4.2 Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in a document where it first occurs.

9.4 Create a logical tab order through links, form controls, and objects.

9.5 Provide keyboard shortcuts to important links (including those in client-side image maps), form controls, and groups of form controls.

10.3 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative (on the current page or some other) for all tables that lay out text in parallel, word-wrapped columns.

11.3 Provide information so that users may receive documents according to their preferences (e.g., language, content type, etc.)

13.5 Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to the navigation mechanism.

13.6 Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group.

13.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences.

13.8 Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings, paragraphs, lists, etc.

13.9 Provide information about document collections (i.e., documents comprising multiple pages.).

14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page.

14.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages.

13.10 Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art.