TAW Logo
TAW 3.0 (2/9/10 2:08 PM) Validation conform to WAI guidelines, W3C Recommendation 5 May 1999
Go to the Fundación CTIC website
Test summary outcome
AutomaticHuman review
Priority 1018
Priority 2123
Priority 3012

1. Human review2. Human review3. Human review
SECCI0N: Información | APARTADO: Sobre legalidades | PAGINA ACTUAL: Accesibilidad |
1. Human review1. Human review2. Human reviewPortada web
3. Human review

Buscar: 2. Automatic

1. Human review
CREDITOS

A C C E S I B I L I D A D



bermemar.com  busca, entre otros objetivos, facilitar el acceso a su portal www.bermemar.com  al mayor número posible de usuarios y en las mejores condiciones de corrección y accesibilidad.

Progresivamente iremos elaborando todas las páginas en conformidad con las Directrices de Accesibilidad para el Contenido Web y acomodándolas de tal manera que cumplan con las oportunas condiciones.

1. Human review2. Human reviewValidado HTML 4.01! | 1. Human review2. Human reviewValidada XHTML 1.1 Por ahora las páginas en las que aparezcan estos logotipos están validadas por W3C para HTML 4.01 Trastional o XHTML Strict. Lo que significa que se usa el cóndigo correctamente y sin errores.

1. Human review2. Human reviewValidado CSS!Asimismo en las que aparezca este otro, la página cumple con todas las directrices referidas al uso correcto de los Estilos en Cascada - CSS.

1. Human review2. Human reviewIcono de conformidad con el Nivel A, de las Directrices de Accesibilidad para el Contenido Web 1.0 del W3C-WAI|1. Human review2. Human reviewValidado por TAW3|
Estamos trabajado también sobre los niveles propuestos por la Iniciativa para la Accesibilidad en la Web.

♦ En un primer momento vamos elaborando páginas en versión texto. Lo indicamos de manera expresa.
♦ Asimismo estamos introduciendo "atajos" para una navegación rápida hacia las páginas principales sin el uso del ratón [Las letras coloreadas son la base de los accesos rápidos, tal como puede comprobarse en las enlaces de la izquierda ].
♦ Iremos corrigiendo los datos erróneos y las deficiencias tipográficos detectadas.

En algunas ocasiones pueden ofrecerse enlaces a páginas externas sobre las que bermemar.com no tiene control alguno y respecto de las cuales se declina toda responsabilidad.

Le invitamos a ayudarnos con sus sugerencias a hacer de este portal un lugar cada vez más accesible y más correcto . Gracias por su colaboración.


Páginas de información:
VALIDACIONES

1. Human review2. Human reviewLas páginas con este logo están validadas para XHTML 1.1| 1. Human review2. Human reviewValidado estilos CSS|
1. Human review2. Human reviewValidado TAW3 |




 Bibliografía
Mapa web
Contacto

Found issues:

Priority 1[WAI] Priority 1 accessibility issues. A Web content developer must satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it impossible to access information in the document. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some groups to be able to use Web documents. No automatically detected problems and 18 problems that require human review have been found.

1.1 Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element (e.g., via "alt", "longdesc", or in element content). This includes: images, graphical representations of text (including symbols), image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets and programmatic objects, ascii art, frames, scripts, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video.

2.1 Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup.

4.1 Clearly identify changes in the natural language of a document's text and any text equivalents (e.g., captions).

6.1 Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets. For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document.

7.1 Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker.

11.4 If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page.

14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content.

Priority 2[WAI] Priority 2 accessibility issues. A Web content developer should satisfy this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it difficult to access information in the document. Satisfying this checkpoint will remove significant barriers to accessing Web documents. 1 automatically detected problem and 23 problems that require human review have been found.

12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls.

2.2a Ensure that foreground and background color combinations for images provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen.

3.1 When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather than images to convey information.

3.2 Create documents that validate to published formal grammars.

3.4 Use relative rather than absolute units in markup language attribute values and style sheet property values.

3.5 Use header elements to convey document structure and use them according to specification.

3.6 Mark up lists and list items properly.

3.7 Mark up quotations. Do not use quotation markup for formatting effects such as indentation.

7.2 Until user agents allow users to control blinking, avoid causing content to blink (i.e., change presentation at a regular rate, such as turning on and off).

7.3 Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid movement in pages.

10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned.

11.1 Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when supported.

13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link.

13.2 Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages and sites.

13.3 Provide information about the general layout of a site (e.g., a site map or table of contents).

13.4 Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner.

Priority 3[WAI] Priority 3 accessibility issues. A Web content developer may address this checkpoint. Otherwise, one or more groups will find it somewhat difficult to access information in the document. Satisfying this checkpoint will improve access to Web documents. No automatically detected problems and 12 problems that require human review have been found.

2.2b Ensure that foreground and background color combinations for text provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen.

4.2 Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in a document where it first occurs.

9.4 Create a logical tab order through links, form controls, and objects.

11.3 Provide information so that users may receive documents according to their preferences (e.g., language, content type, etc.)

13.5 Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to the navigation mechanism.

13.6 Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group.

13.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences.

13.8 Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings, paragraphs, lists, etc.

13.9 Provide information about document collections (i.e., documents comprising multiple pages.).

14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page.

14.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages.

13.10 Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art.